However, such hardware can raise costs, increase the vehicle's weight and mass, and reduce image quality while still not addressing the challenge of obstacle avoidance for safe flight. Drone vendors try to compensate for the need to fly far away from obstacles by incorporating large cameras and zoom lenses. Drone technology is continuously evolving, with a range of aircraft and sensors driving an opportunity that is forecasted to be worth $42.8 billion by 2025ĭespite advances, traditional drones still require highly trained pilots to safely fly them around obstacles while fulfilling the goals of a flight session (e.g., to film a specific object or area). This is especially true when legacy methods involve heavy equipment that can be costly, inefficient, and disruptive or involve dangerous activities that can put professionals' lives at risk (e.g., industrial inspectors or first responders). See the original post here.ĭrones hold the potential to touch a myriad of industries, unlock new business outcomes, and deliver countless benefits. ![]() That’s not uncommon with drones that rely on Wi-Fi, but I’d expect better from a dedicated controller.The following blog was created jointly by Qualcomm and Skydio, and was recently published by Dev Singh on the Qualcomm Developer Network. Even when connectivity was strong, the video feed felt like it was about half a second behind the drone. Regardless of which controller I used, it always felt like I started losing signal at about 400 feet and I think I’m being generous with that estimate. Lastly, video transmission connectivity seems to be worse than other drones. But it’s definitely less frustrating than crashing your drone. Will it go under an obstacle, above, or around it? Or will it come to a complete stop? There’s no way to tell and that unpredictability could be frustrating. There’s no way to turn off obstacle avoidance, meaning it might start making choices you don’t always agree with. Hopefully that’s something Skydio will address in a software update rather than waiting on a new product.Īnother choice: how this drone flies. Sure, you can do that manually, but I wanted more from my flying robot. For instance, you can’t take bracketed photos in case you want to do exposure blending on your own, and there are no fun photo modes like 360 spherical photos, 180 panoramas, or vertical shots. But still, the photo mode feels a bit unfinished and underwhelming. ![]() When it comes to photos, Skydio takes 12MP photos in both RAW and JPG, which is a bit low on paper, but the photos I got out of it were acceptable - minimal chromatic aberration, sharp edges, and good overall detail. Still, you’ll be happy with some other options like 120 fps slow motion at 1080p and HDR filming which - and I don’t say this too often - actually looks good despite oversaturated reds and greens. Once you start raising the ISO, you will naturally invite more noise, but you’ll also notice how the footage starts losing that contrast and color. That said, the footage you get out of that standard color profile is solid - colors pop, white balance is on point, dynamic range is decent and it’s as sharp as you need it to be, as long as you keep shooting with a very low ISO. (Note to self: stop being snobby about color.) That’s going to be totally fine for the majority of users, but not for me personally and my line of work. ![]() ![]() There’s nothing like a flat, cine-like mode to open up more flexibility to manipulate colors and exposure in post-processing. One such choice is that the Skydio 2 only films in one color mode. I don’t mean that the image quality is bad it’s more that this drone operates more like a flying robot than a flying camera. Skydio made some clear choices here, and I’ll tell you right now that the Skydio 2 is not for professionals.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |